Click here for HomePagewww.RadMod.com
St. Louis, MO USA
The Radical Moderate
Covering: Big Brother, Propaganda, Theocracy and Liberty
By Tim Willoughby, Y.A.W.L. *
(* Yet Another Wretched Lawyer)

 
HOME RM's Platform RM's Quals About the RadMod TimsLaw.com
 

Libertarian Democrat

A Libertarian Democrat is vigorously pro-personal liberty, and believes government can play a constructive role in regulating our economy and providing a social safety net.

Categories:

About

Help Beta Test:

  • The RadMod is trying to convert an old fashioned HTML business website, TimsLaw.com, over to Wordpress. Feedback on how TimsLaw works would be appreciated.

Credits:

Internal Links:

A Moderate Motto:

"Few things in life are as good or as bad as they seem in the emotions of the moment."
--- An Anonymous Moderate

John G. Roberts is apparently another “Federalist Society” zealot and idealogue
Posted in Category: Law-Courts

As I said I would do, I am following the John Roberts nomination and finding info wherever I can.

He apparently is a member of the Federalist Society. See this comprehensive background article on John Roberts from Dkosopedia.

See this Dkosopedia article for much more on the Federalist Society’s background. The Federalist Society is less than 25 years old. It was apparently founded in part by Ed Meese. Remember Ed Meese? The money to build the organization came from the Santa Clause of the hard religious right, Mr. Scaife.

People for the American Way had this to say about the Federalist Society, as of 2002.

I generally disapprove of the philosophy of the Federalist Society, which I view as theocratic because of its talk about injecting “traditional values” into the legal system. I view “traditional values” as a term that actually means “a kinder gentler theocracy”.

I concur with the excerpt below in criticizing the Federalist Society for wanting to role back the clock about 150 years.

Idealogues like those in the Federalist Society are no more persuasive than religious fanatics - They have a belief system that they take on faith and they attempt to rigidly apply that belief system to the ever-gray areas of reality.

I can’t blame people for needing a set of guiding principles, but let’s be frank that the Federalists are just like religious zealots in their unrealistic belief that America should return to the legal attitudes of a time long lost. (And by the way, I feel similarly about hardcore economic libertarian zealots who consider the unfettered free market as being the ideal - we already tried that, in times long past, and it failed)

Ask yourself something: Why is it that we evolved as a society, and in our attitudes and laws, AWAY FROM the attitudes of 150 years ago?

Might the following have played a teensy little role?: We addressed REAL PROBLEMS that resulted from our growth as a nation. For example, we created environmental laws out of necessity as unfettered businessmen poisoned our air and water. We created labor codes because we got sick and tired of unfettered businessmen overworking our children, and paying wages so low that our people had to work 12 hour days to buy basic necessities, and killing our workers with unsafe workplaces.

I could go on and on. I guess I might mention the lack of equality in our society, and the need for civil rights laws.

Anyway, I view the Federalist Society as a backdoor way to undo the enlightenment and impose utopian theocratic principles on society. I inject theocracy into the mix because it just happens that the Federalist Society philosophy promotes the intermixing of conservative religious doctrine and government. It’s my view that those attracted to the Federalists tend to fit the mold of religious conservatives, more so than they do libertarianism.

I rejected the opportunity to join the Federalist Society in law school, at Washington University, primarily because I viewed the society as being, in reality, dedicated to breaking down the wall of separation between church and state. However, I respect a lot of the non-religious positions of the Federalists.

Businessmen will love what the Federalists do. But the common working people would suffer if the Federalists were to have their way.

But that’s just my opinion, and I could be wrong. So give me some feedback and set me straight.

I don’t think we need another Federalist on the Supreme Court. We already have two it seems.

Yes, I guess that means Bush and the Republicans are trying to have the Federalists take over the Supreme Court.

Remember: Federalists who are active Republicans are not just Republicans —- they are a special breed of Republican; zealots who want to undo all manner of progressive legislation. We don’t need zealots of any stripe on the Supreme Court.

(However, it’s always possible that Roberts is not a zealot himself, and just likes to be a member of the Federalists for the resume points and the friendship - so he might be ok after all)

But I vote no on Roberts, because of his involvement with the Federalist Society, until he shows that he himself will not act as a zealot on the Court.

Judicial Nominees Special Report: John G. Roberts
He is also a member of the Federalist Society, an ultra-conservative organization committed to returning to a pre-Civil War era of unquestioned states’ rights and rolling back legislation that has advanced women’s rights, civil rights, environmental protections and health and safety standards. Federalist Society heroes and leaders you might recognize are Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah).

 

END of article
    (Printable version)    

 

2 Responses to “John G. Roberts is apparently another “Federalist Society” zealot and idealogue”

  1. Ted Says:

    NOW? The only nominees they would endorse are those that have represented Planned Parenthood.

    http://www.fed-soc.org/

    Other participants and speakers at the Federalist Society:
    Patricia Ireland, National Organization for Women (lol)
    Stephen Breyer
    Ruth Bader Ginsburg
    Anthony Kennedy
    Lloyd Cutler
    John Podesta
    Michael Dukakis
    Barney Frank
    Ralph Nader
    Michael Kinsley
    Juan Williams
    There are many more on the list: http://www.fed-soc.org/Press/participants-speakers.htm

    BTW: You don’t get to vote. Your representatives in the senate will both vote yes.

  2. Lenny Says:

    I guess you can vote yes now.
    Federalist Affiliation Misstated
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/20/AR2005 072002431.html
    “And practically everyone — CNN, the Los Angeles Times, Legal Times and, just yesterday, The Washington Post — has reported Roberts’s membership as a fact. One liberal group opposed to Roberts’s nomination, the Alliance for Justice, has noted it on its Web site.
    But they are wrong. John Roberts is not, in fact, a member of the Federalist Society, and he says he never has been.”

Leave a Reply



Link:
John G. Roberts is apparently another “Federalist Society” zealot and idealogue

by on Thursday July 21, 2005.
Category: Law-Courts.

 

PREVIOUS post in SAME category as this post:
Bush nominates John Roberts, a long time Republican political ally, to Supreme Court

 

NEXT post in SAME category as this post:
Nominee John Roberts has background in using law to advance right wing social agenda, and wife is counsel to anti-abortion group. What's that mean?

The RM is a "Libertarian Democrat"

A Libertarian Democrat is vigorously pro-personal liberty, and believes government can play a constructive role in regulating our economy and providing a social safety net.

Lawyers Must
Speak Out!

We must keep our ears tuned to the degeneration toward tyranny.
See Justice O'Connor's Warning.

Recent Rants:

  1. Interpetting that Roger Ailes joke about Obama, Bush and Terrorism
    in Cat: Propaganda-Media
  2. Example of Dem wingnuttery in an extreme gun ban bill (it’s probably DOA tho)
    in Cat: Politics-misc, Libertarian
  3. 11th Circuit says no right to sexual privacy, upholds Alabama ban on sale of dildos
    in Cat: Theocracy, Libertarian, Law-Courts
  4. The era of Republicans ignoring the Golden Rule has ended
    in Cat: Politics-misc
  5. National Park Service no longer discusses age of Grand Canyon - Bush further muzzles science
    in Cat: Science vs Religion
  6. Disease of willful ignorance
    in Cat: Politics-misc
  7. St. Louis County touchscreen voting: Great news and awful news
    in Cat: Politics-misc
  8. GOP merges terror and culture wars: Porn prosecutions UP, Crime -Terror prosecutions DOWN
    in Cat: Libertarian, War
  9. Skeptical Maxims about Polls and Democrats
    in Cat: Politics-misc
  10. Bush admin, not Clinton, screwed up with North Korea
    in Cat: Propaganda-Media, War

Links:

Politics
Anti-Theocracy
Media Watchdogs
  • MediaMatters.org
    Former right wing propagandist saw the light, and shines light on right wing media
  • NewsBusters
    Focusing on liberal bias in the media, food for thought for moderates and liberals
  • Newshounds
    The NewsHounds keep a close eye on the FoxNews propaganda machine
Misc
HOME  | Top of page  | Tim's Employment Law site - www.TimsLaw.com

CONTACT the RadMod

[powered by WordPress.]

Get Firefox!