|
|
|
Libertarian DemocratA Libertarian Democrat is vigorously pro-personal liberty, and believes government can play a constructive role in regulating our economy and providing a social safety net. Categories:
About
Help Beta Test:
Credits:
Internal Links:A Moderate Motto:"Few things in life are as good or as bad as they seem in the emotions of the moment." |
This entry is about the Schiavo story and politics. Those who read my earlier post about Schiavo know that I am inclined to support efforts to prevent her from being starved to death. When I read the below-excerpted DailyKOS diary, I was kinda shocked to say the least, that the mainstream meadia would NOT have covered the apparent hypocrisy of the Republicans and George W. Bush in particular. That’s why I am a bit skeptical that the diary is accurately reporting things. So I await further info and withhold the harshest judgment till later. ISSUE: Did George W. Bush sign a Texas Law that permits hospital to pull the plug Against the Wishes of the Family when a patient is brain dead and cannot pay for care? If Bush did such a thing, I would be surprised. If he did such a thing, then he HAD to have the support of the very conservative Texas Republican Party. IF (a BIG if) Bush and the Republicans SUPPORTED such a position, I would expect the media to be ALL OVER HIM about the Schiavo Bill, where Congress wants to intrude into Florida’s state rights. I would expect the left-wing spinwits to blow the Texas law out of proportion in order to embarass Bush and the Republicans. I would expect the right-wing spinwits to underplay (or even ignore) the Texas law rather than discuss its real terms and impact, to protect Bush and the Republicans from embarassment. I would SO much rather read blogs, for and against, and decide for myself, rather than listen to the spinwits from either side. There is even more: Apparently Randall Terry, the anti-abortion crusader and founder of Operation Rescue, has linked up with the parents of Schiavo to lobby for the involvement of other powerful people (press release). This reminds me of when Al Sharpton comes to town whenever there is a racial issue. The Republican political thinkers apparently see the Schiavo situation as a public relations goldmine to keep its base energized. People like Randall Terry might NOT be thinking of the good politics and instead are only following their gut. But the Power Brokers are ALWAYS thinking of the politics. BTW: Click here for Randall Terry’s flyer talking about Schiavo’s mental and physical state. I don’t know if he is accurate or not, but it’s interesting to read. One more thing: The Schiavo bill signed by George Bush last night is anti-conservative in that the bill expands the role of the Federal Government by creating a new way in which the Feds can interefere with a State’s resolution of an issue. In addition, the Federal Government has taken a giant step into our personal lives (where the State has historically been the most active player when compared to the Feds). [UPDATE] 2) Bush’s law DID result in a baby being killed against the wishes of the parents WOW! This can’t be true — I MUST be misinterpreting. Would someone please set me straight on this (but courteously please!).
END of article
One Response to “Daily Kos :: Schiavo hypocrisy? Bush signed a Texas Law Encouraging Pulling the Plug - Spinwits will be silent about it.”Leave a Reply
PREVIOUS post in SAME category as this post:
HoustonChronicle.com - Bush's Texas Law- Case is the first in which a judge allowed a hospital to discontinue care
NEXT post in SAME category as this post:
Yahoo! News - Brain-Damaged Woman's Feeding Tube Removed The RM is a "Libertarian Democrat"A Libertarian Democrat is vigorously pro-personal liberty, and believes government can play a constructive role in regulating our economy and providing a social safety net. |
Lawyers Must
Speak Out! We must keep our ears tuned to the degeneration toward tyranny. Recent Rants:
Links:Politics
Anti-Theocracy
Media Watchdogs
Misc
|
March 21st, 2005 at 9:12 am
A Texas law enacted September 1, 1999 (guess who was governor then) says:
quote..
CHAPTER 166. ADVANCE DIRECTIVES - SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS - ยง 166.046 (e) If the patient or the person responsible for the health care decisions of the patient is requesting life-sustaining treatment that the attending physician has decided and the review process has affirmed is inappropriate treatment, the patient shall be given available life-sustaining treatment pending transfer under Subsection (d). The patient is responsible for any costs incurred in transferring the patient to another facility. The physician and the health care facility are not obligated to provide life-sustaining treatment after the 10th day after the written decision required under Subsection (b) is provided to the patient or the person responsible for the health care decisions of the patient unless ordered to do so under Subsection (g)
..end quote
Regards.