|
|
Search Disabled Temporarily
|
|
Libertarian DemocratA Libertarian Democrat is vigorously pro-personal liberty, and believes government can play a constructive role in regulating our economy and providing a social safety net. Categories:
About
Help Beta Test:
Credits:
Internal Links:A Moderate Motto:"Few things in life are as good or as bad as they seem in the emotions of the moment." |
Your patriotic blood should boil at this story of apparent official corruption by the Bush administration and the Republican Party and the Secret Service. The story starts with three persons who held tickets for a publically funded Bush public forum. At such forums, when public funds are used, it is a violation of the US Constitution for peaceful persons to be excluded based on their political beliefs. Moreover, it’s just plain fascist or communist or totalitarian to exclude peaceful citizens from publically funded events based on their political party affiliation. Bush uses public funds to arrange the forums, but then lets the Republican Party decide who gets to come. The Republican Party cannot OVERTLY demand that only Republicans can get tickets. HOWEVER, the Republicans have a workaround —- They look for signs and symptoms that ticket holders might actually be Democrats or other non-Bush supporters. Then Party Officials instruct the Secret Service to deny such persons admission. That’s illegal, and is a violation of our civil rights as Americans, as well as probably a violation of umpteen ethics laws. That’s the story, and it’s utterly UnAmerican if true. I suspect it’s illegal. I’d rather see Congress hold hearings on Bush’s ethics than on steroids, but they don’t ask me. I hope all moderate minded persons reading this are as offended as I am. I invite anyone interested to defend the actions of Bush and the Republicans and the Secret Service, assuming the story to be true. I supect that even such defenders will know, in their heart of hearts, that this is just plain UnAmerican, whether they are willing to admit it or not.
END of article
4 Responses to “Bush’s Secret Service admits it kicks out peaceful Dems from publically funded forums when Republicans Party wants it to — It’s UnAmerican”Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment.
PREVIOUS post in SAME category as this post:
Blogging is all fun and games, until the boss finds out - Feb. 14, 2005 Watching as the GOP develops a new propaganda vehicle for the spinwits to demagogue about - the ACVR
NEXT post in SAME category as this post:
CNN.com - Lawmakers: Hands off Web logs - Rush Limbaugh trying to calm a violent caller, and thoughts from the RM about that. The RM is a "Libertarian Democrat"A Libertarian Democrat is vigorously pro-personal liberty, and believes government can play a constructive role in regulating our economy and providing a social safety net. |
Lawyers Must
Speak Out! We must keep our ears tuned to the degeneration toward tyranny. Recent Rants:
Links:Politics
Anti-Theocracy
Media Watchdogs
Misc
|
March 30th, 2005 at 5:51 am
*
*
*
2 minutes with google:
They were members of the group Denver Progressives, formerly known as MoveOnDenver.org.
They wore T-shirts that said “Stop the lies.”
March 30th, 2005 at 7:47 pm
Humm, their t-shirts display peaceful disagreement using the printed word. That’s more than just a bumper sticker, but not enough to exclude them as troublemakers.
Is it a violation of their first amendment right of free speech to deny them access to a publically funded event because of their peacefully expressed political viewpoint?
The courts would say Yes.
And I expect the courts would say Yes no matter whether they were Republican or Democratic appointees.
The courts are almost of one mind on free speech issues when the speech is peaceful and political.
The courts mostly diverge on the degree of freedom to engage in speech having to do with human sexuality.
March 30th, 2005 at 9:44 pm
I wasn’t making an argument, just supplying omitted facts. It makes one wonder what other facts were omitted, and why.
National security has to be factored into the equation. We are a nation at war. Many in these far left groups openly express hatred for the president, side with our enemies, and have a history of violence. So far, we’ve heard one side’s version of the facts. You can assume their peacefulness, I won’t. I’ll wait for ALL of the facts before I pass judgment.
It’s funny how you’ll blindly defend the 1st amendment rights of the people you agree with; yet ignore the 1st amendment rights of those you oppose (“religious pharmacists”).
February 1st, 2010 at 7:37 pm
Wow, it’s been nearly 5 years. Maybe my memory isn’t as bad as I thought. I ran across this story today and remembered your article. The courts don’t agree with you.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/01/29/24212.htm