|
|
|
Libertarian DemocratA Libertarian Democrat is vigorously pro-personal liberty, and believes government can play a constructive role in regulating our economy and providing a social safety net. Categories:
About
Help Beta Test:
Credits:
Internal Links:A Moderate Motto:"Few things in life are as good or as bad as they seem in the emotions of the moment." |
See the link below for info about Yahoo! coughing up search and email records on a dissident who was convicted of “trying to overthrow the socialist system” by joining a Democratic group and posting to his blog. Yahoo! issued a statement, referenced in the article linked below, explaining that Yahoo! cooperates with Chinese authorities because Yahoo! believes its continuing presence in China contributes to modernizing Chinese society. (It’s a Greater Good argument, or an Ends Justifies the Means argument) My American libertarian sensibilities scream at Yahoo! to get the hell out of China if they must contribute to a repressive police state system where dissidents are jailed for years for their words. But then I think: What if Yahoo! and Google decided not to do business with China, due to their American unwillingness to help put people in prison for their political thoughts? In that case, the Chinese government would form its own Big Brother-Loving search engine company, willing to snitch on the dissidents. How would the world’s online industry handle traffic flowing from the Big Brother Chinese Search Engine? Now, if you know how the internet and search engines work, then you know that websites can choose to BAN search engines from spidering and caching their site. How many USA companies would BAN the Chinese search engine from spidering? How many USA businesses would BAN referrals from Chinese search engines? Don’t we WANT Chinese money? I think USA businesses would by and large open their web portals to Chinese search engines, despite the repressive government. Also, you can bet that the Chinese search engine would contain FAR less info than even the heavily censored Chinese versions of Yahoo! and Google. Therefore, Yahoo! and Google will expose the Chinese people to far more info and political commentary than the Chinese’s home-grown search engine would make available. So I can understand Yahoo!’s argument that it’s better in the long term, for freedom, to cooperate with the Chinese now. BUT —– I still come down on the side of Stay the Hell Out of China, if it means you have to cooperate with a repressive government in busting people. Have some principles, Yahoo! and Google. Chinese dissidents will find backdoors around the Big-Brother-Loving Chinese Government Search Engine. For example, a website will appear to be acceptable to the Chinese Search Engine - but through word of mouth, dissidents will learn what codes to type to open up the REAL content of the site, content that is hidden from the Search Engine ….. things like that. Google and Yahoo! could be in the forefront of providing tools for the rest of the world to use in masking their real content from the Chinese spiders …. etc, but NOT if they are in bed with the Chinese government. It’s unimaginable that Google and Yahoo! would agree to be a part of the police state in China.
END of article
One Response to “Difficult problem of US Search Engines like Yahoo and Google helping China bust dissidents”Leave a Reply
PREVIOUS post in SAME category as this post:
Michael Chertoff talks about secret court opinions, thousands of phone numbers monitored, 90% not interesting for intelligence purposes
NEXT post in SAME category as this post:
Another Tool that despots can use against us - Patriot Act proposal to vastly expand jurisdiction of Secret Service Uniformed Division The RM is a "Libertarian Democrat"A Libertarian Democrat is vigorously pro-personal liberty, and believes government can play a constructive role in regulating our economy and providing a social safety net. |
Lawyers Must
Speak Out! We must keep our ears tuned to the degeneration toward tyranny. Recent Rants:
Links:Politics
Anti-Theocracy
Media Watchdogs
Misc
|
February 15th, 2006 at 6:56 pm
Most people can’t “read between the lines” with the China censorship issue. Hundreds of U.S. businesses have been conforming to the Chinese government for years. So why all the fuss now about Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo? And why limit ourselves to the narrow confines of the search engine industry?
The answer is simple. Uncle Sam wants control of the internet, and that means getting power over search engines. Google has already snubbed their noses at the Bush administration by deciding not to comply with a search warrant that could have disclosed key information about how search results are displayed.
Imagine for a moment that the CIA learned how to manipulate search engine results by reverse engineering the Google algorithim that ranks pages. If the CIA or White House could push certain keywords and websites to the top of searches through manipulation, they could more effectively conduct psychological operations if they wanted to.
Google for their part is following the lead of many other Fortune 500 companies by complying with Chinese government regulations and censorship laws. The ONLY reason it’s getting so much attention now is that Uncle Sam is trying to get any kind of leverage it can over the internet’s golden boy, Google.
Prediction: Uncle Sam will push it’s anti-google propoganda until Google gives them what they want. Google will probably lose the warrant fight and hand over a few terrabytes of data for the NSA to crunch.
But it wouldn’t be the most corrupt thing they have ever done: http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635160132,00.html
p.s. if you don’t believe Uncle Sam wants control of the internet read this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4655196.stm